Pushing to the paretic side — verticality misperceived
| Patient | 71F |
|---|---|
| ConditionContraversive pushing (pusher syndrome), right MCA infarct | |
| Severity | SCP 3 |
| Days since onset | 14 |
| Before these symptomsIndependent. Retired seamstress; tended the allotment and walked the grandchildren to school. | |
| Also on the chartHypertension and atrial fibrillation — anticoagulated | |
| PrecautionsActive pushing — two-person assist for all standing work until the SCP falls; Anticoagulated — any fall with head contact triggers medical review, not just incident paperwork | |
Test yourself
What is driving the pushing?
The teaching
Pusher syndrome is one of the few balance presentations where the mechanism was measured rather than guessed: Karnath’s work showed these patients experience their body as upright when it is tilted toward the paretic side — a mis-set graviceptive vertical with an intact visual one — and Pedersen’s Copenhagen cohort put numbers to the incidence and the longer rehabilitation course. Neglect travels with it and is not the engine; an otolith lesion would tilt the visual vertical and does not. The treatment follows the dissociation: feed true vertical through the channel that works — mirrors, reference lines, real vertical tasks — grade weight-bearing through the non-paretic side, and score the response on Baccini’s Scale for Contraversive Pushing. What you do with it: stop arguing with her vertical, show it to her instead, position her inside a base she can control, and re-score the SCP so the whole team sees the same slope.
- Falls during transfers while the push is strong — supervision level and equipment reviewed before every session, not after the event
- Any new neglect deepening, drowsiness or new weakness — this is a fresh stroke problem, not a balance one; escalate
Read next
The full sequence
This page carries the case’s first decision. The full sequence — every decision, the examination by domain, and the debrief that grades you — is in the drill, and the library is included with membership.
Sources on this page: Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000. Pedersen PM et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation — the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 · Baccini M, Paci M, Rinaldi LA. The scale for contraversive pushing: a reliability and validity study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000. Pedersen PM et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation — the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996