NeuroDash

The case library

subacute — tier 3 — balance & falls

Pushing to the paretic side — verticality misperceived

Patient71F
ConditionContraversive pushing (pusher syndrome), right MCA infarct
SeveritySCP 3
Days since onset14
Before these symptomsIndependent. Retired seamstress; tended the allotment and walked the grandchildren to school.
Also on the chartHypertension and atrial fibrillation — anticoagulated
PrecautionsActive pushing — two-person assist for all standing work until the SCP falls; Anticoagulated — any fall with head contact triggers medical review, not just incident paperwork

Test yourself

What is driving the pushing?

The teaching

Pusher syndrome is one of the few balance presentations where the mechanism was measured rather than guessed: Karnath’s work showed these patients experience their body as upright when it is tilted toward the paretic side — a mis-set graviceptive vertical with an intact visual one — and Pedersen’s Copenhagen cohort put numbers to the incidence and the longer rehabilitation course. Neglect travels with it and is not the engine; an otolith lesion would tilt the visual vertical and does not. The treatment follows the dissociation: feed true vertical through the channel that works — mirrors, reference lines, real vertical tasks — grade weight-bearing through the non-paretic side, and score the response on Baccini’s Scale for Contraversive Pushing. What you do with it: stop arguing with her vertical, show it to her instead, position her inside a base she can control, and re-score the SCP so the whole team sees the same slope.

  • Falls during transfers while the push is strong — supervision level and equipment reviewed before every session, not after the event
  • Any new neglect deepening, drowsiness or new weakness — this is a fresh stroke problem, not a balance one; escalate

Read next

The full sequence

This page carries the case’s first decision. The full sequence — every decision, the examination by domain, and the debrief that grades you — is in the drill, and the library is included with membership.

Sources on this page: Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000. Pedersen PM et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation — the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 · Baccini M, Paci M, Rinaldi LA. The scale for contraversive pushing: a reliability and validity study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000. Pedersen PM et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation — the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996