Challenging Balance Training: A New Frontier for Fall Prevention in MS
This brief explores a recent feasibility trial on a highly challenging balance training program for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The program, adapted from a successful Parkinson's disease intervention, focuses on progressive, individually adjusted exercises that challenge stability, agility, and sensory integration. The findings suggest that this approach is feasible and shows promise for improving balance and potentially reducing fall risk in individuals with mild to moderate MS.
Research: March 2023
Related Videos
Balance Training for MS: 4 Exercises to Improve Balance
How To Improve Balance And Stability for Multiple Sclerosis
Key Findings
1Feasibility of a highly challenging balance program for MS.
2The Mini-BESTest is a suitable primary outcome measure.
3Positive trend in balance improvement (median 3.5-point increase on Mini-BESTest).
4High satisfaction with the intervention from participants.
5Need for adjustments to improve retention and attendance in a full-scale trial.
As clinicians, we're always on the lookout for effective ways to help our patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) manage their symptoms and improve their quality of life. One of the most significant challenges for many is the risk of falls due to balance impairments. That's why we were so interested to come across a recent feasibility trial that explored a new approach to balance training – one that’s highly challenging and specifically designed for people with MS.\n\nThis study, conducted by Wallin and colleagues in Sweden, adapted a successful balance training program originally developed for Parkinson's disease. The core idea is to move beyond generic exercises and create a program that pushes the boundaries of a person's balance control system. The intervention was delivered in a group setting, with one-hour sessions two to three times a week for 10 weeks. The program was divided into three blocks, with each block increasing in difficulty and complexity.\n\nBlock A focused on basic single-task exercises targeting the four key components of balance control: stability limits, motor agility, anticipatory postural adjustments, and sensory integration. In Block B, the challenge was ramped up by adding either a cognitive or a motor dual-task to the exercises. For example, a patient might be asked to walk on a narrow base of support while simultaneously counting backward or carrying an object. Finally, in Block C, the exercises and dual-tasks were combined to create an even more complex and challenging environment.\n\nWhat we found particularly compelling about this approach is the emphasis on individualization. The physiotherapists leading the sessions constantly adjusted the exercises to match each participant's capacity. This was done by altering the base of support, changing the gait speed, manipulating visual input, and adding or modifying dual-tasks. The goal was to keep the challenge level high but manageable, ensuring that each person was working at their optimal level.\n\nThe results of this feasibility trial were promising. While the study was small, with only 12 participants, the researchers found that the intervention was feasible and well-received. Participants reported high satisfaction with the program, and the researchers observed a positive trend in balance improvement. The median improvement on the Mini-BESTest, a measure of dynamic balance, was 3.5 points. This is a clinically meaningful improvement and suggests that this type of training could have a real impact on patients' lives.\n\nOf course, this was a feasibility study, so we need to be cautious about drawing firm conclusions. The study had a small sample size and no control group. The researchers also noted that they had some challenges with retention and attendance, which they plan to address in a future, full-scale trial. However, the findings provide a strong rationale for further investigation into this type of highly challenging balance training for people with MS.\n\nSo, what does this mean for our clinical practice? It suggests that we should consider moving beyond traditional, less challenging balance exercises and embrace a more progressive and individualized approach. We should be looking for ways to incorporate dual-tasking and sensory integration challenges into our treatment plans. And we should be using outcome measures like the Mini-BESTest to track our patients' progress and ensure that our interventions are having the desired effect.\n\nThis study is a great reminder that we should always be pushing the boundaries of what we think is possible for our patients. By embracing a more challenging and evidence-based approach to balance training, we can help people with MS improve their stability, reduce their risk of falls, and live more active and fulfilling lives.
Clinician's Note
As a clinician who has worked with many people with MS, I find this study particularly exciting. It reinforces what many of us have suspected for a long time: that our patients are capable of more than we often give them credit for. The idea of a highly challenging balance program might seem daunting at first, but this research shows that with the right support and guidance, it can be a safe and effective way to improve balance and reduce fall risk. I'm looking forward to seeing the results of the full-scale trial and to incorporating some of these principles into my own practice.
Clinic Action Plan
[
"Assess patients for suitability for a high-challenge program.",
"Incorporate dual-tasking and sensory integration exercises.",
"Use the Mini-BESTest to track progress.",
"Monitor and adjust the level of challenge based on patient feedback.",
"Consider a group setting to improve motivation."
]
Common Mistakes to Avoid
•Not progressing the difficulty of the exercises.
•Neglecting to incorporate dual-tasking.
•Using a one-size-fits-all approach.
•Not getting feedback from the patient on the level of challenge.
Frequently Asked Questions
Premium Deep Dive
This brief includes an extended deep-dive section with clinical nuance, dosing details, edge cases, and special population considerations.